Totalfinder show file size in status bar11/28/2023 ![]() ![]() #1 started happening in 10.11, before then it worked like you and I wanted. Go back deep down the folder hierarchy, and the Finder stops reacting / accepting the drop again. What makes me certain it's the deep nesting that caused the Finder to go limp? Just keep going up the folder hierarchy, until magically one of the upper level folders start taking the dragged images (immediate clue is the Finder highlighting the inner boundary of the open folder). In the latter case, it's not a mistake of the user missing the target folder and dropping onto the desktop in the background. There're two potential outcomes: EITHER (in most cases) nothing happens, as in the Finder not even highlighting the inner boundary of the open Finder folder in response to drag-n-drop action like it's supposed to under normal circumstances, OR (sometimes) the dragged images always end up on the Desktop (much to one's surprise) in total disregard to the intent of the drag-n-drop. Try to drag-n-drop web images from a web browser into the deepest nested folder. Whether it's the extra few milliseconds of hitting "Cmd+C" or just the act seems to stop Finder from its stupidity. The workaround, as I've found, is to do a Cmd+C of the "new name" right after finishing typing it. This has happened hundreds of times in my experience, even mostly on my SSD startup volume. How utterly frustrating is that, after a long typing? Even worse, there's no reversal (Cmd+Z) to redo or undo the renaming by the Finder, because the Finder apparently seems too slow to handle the back-to-back action of a human user duplicating a folder and immediately renaming that. "custom name copy", *after* you've finished typing "new name". If you do it fast enough (like me), you will be rudely surprised that Finder automagically renames the duplicate folder *back* to the previous name, i.e. Now immediately try to give this duplicate folder a new name. Have a look at our solutions below and choose the one that appeals to you.I have two examples of Finder's royal suckitude fresh on my mind: Having all these criteria in mind, we have gathered the top Mac Finder alternative solutions. As you are dealing with the important files and you are searching for an app to work with them, reliability should be an issue of your concern in order to avoid any bugs and data damage. Reliability is what we always keep in mind, but never talk about.It can help you to compare information from the single pane. The most convenient and easy way to work with your data. Additional features are also a great plus for a good Finder replacement, such as batch renaming, synchronization of files and folders, network file management, etc.In an ideal scenario, you should have the right way to find the files/folders you want. It should cover every aspect of the app, especially viewing options. Another key factor is customizability. ![]() In brief, the no-learning scenario is the best one. Users do not need to spend hours in front of the computer screen learning how to work with this utility. The user interface of the file management software should be rather intuitive.Let’s try to figure out what features should an efficient Finder alternative have? Or what to look for in its alternative. What features should have a good alternative to Mac Finder? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |